<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>doaipm — DO AI PM</title><description>Become a product manager in the AI era. Speak it, and AI builds it (言出法随).</description><link>https://doaipm.com/</link><language>en</language><item><title>CXMT Jumped 466% on Day One. The Company Has No Product Manager</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/cxmt-the-product-is-staying-alive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/cxmt-the-product-is-staying-alive/</guid><description>On July 27, 2026, ChangXin Memory listed on the STAR Market and closed up 465.82% at a 3.28 trillion yuan valuation, raising 57.9 billion yuan — the largest IPO in STAR Market history. Three years ago it lost 16.7 billion; cumulative losses hit 36.65 billion. This year it made 24.7 billion in a single quarter. DRAM specs are written by JEDEC and prices are set by the cycle. In twenty years, not one of Zhu Yiming&apos;s key decisions was a product decision.</description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Tech Commentary</category><category>Product Management</category><category>Semiconductors</category><category>CXMT</category></item><item><title>The TIME Cover Shows a $650,000 Mecha. Wang Xingxing&apos;s Best Seller Costs Under $5,000</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/wang-xingxing-price-is-the-product/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/wang-xingxing-price-is-the-product/</guid><description>On July 23, Wang Xingxing and the GD01 manned mecha landed on the cover of TIME. But inside the issue sits a different set of numbers, and those are the ones product people should read: robot dogs down from $45,000 to under $2,000 in six years, the R1 under $5,000 — and 74% of shipments going to universities and labs. The product he is really pushing is the price curve.</description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Tech Commentary</category><category>Product Management</category><category>Robotics</category><category>Unitree</category></item><item><title>Liang Wenfeng Is Now the World&apos;s Richest AI Founder — By Doing the Opposite of Every Big Tech Giant</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/deepseek-founder-richest/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/deepseek-founder-richest/</guid><description>Bloomberg&apos;s data: DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng is worth $36 billion, doubled in a year, surpassing the co-founders of OpenAI and Anthropic to become the richest person in pure AI foundation models. From a product manager&apos;s angle, here&apos;s why his &apos;narrow and deep&apos; bet outran the giants stacking money and headcount.</description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>big-tech watch</category><category>AI strategy</category><category>DeepSeek</category><category>product managers</category></item><item><title>AI Tore Down the &apos;I Can&apos;t&apos; Wall — the One Left Is in Your Head</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/impossible-wall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/impossible-wall/</guid><description>A few hundred people at DeepSeek out-built a company of 100,000+. WAIC opened a whole zone for one-person companies. Three years ago, both were filed under &apos;impossible.&apos; Most of the walls that fell these past two years were the same kind: I don&apos;t know how to do this. But there&apos;s one wall AI can&apos;t knock down.</description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>AI era</category><category>product managers</category><category>solo builders</category><category>doaipm</category></item><item><title>3.17 Million in Bonus, But Not Even the Freedom to Show It Off</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/salary-leak-watermark/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/salary-leak-watermark/</guid><description>A project lead on Tencent&apos;s WeChat line had a year-end incentive of about 3.17 million yuan and was rated Outstanding twice. He posted a screenshot of his pay — and days later was fired, blacklisted, and marked never-to-be-rehired. Let&apos;s talk about Big Tech&apos;s high-voltage lines, and one gut-punch of a truth: the money you break your back to earn — you don&apos;t even fully own the freedom to show it off.</description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>big-tech watch</category><category>workplace</category><category>working life</category><category>high-voltage line</category></item><item><title>Alibaba Is Doing the Math, Tencent Is Paying Tuition: A PM&apos;s Read on the Big-Tech AI Split</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/tencent-alibaba-ai/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/tencent-alibaba-ai/</guid><description>Both poured 100 billion yuan into AI. In Q1 2026, Alibaba&apos;s cloud AI revenue crossed 30% of external revenue for the first time, while Tencent lost about 8.8 billion yuan. But Tencent wasn&apos;t idle either — WorkBuddy became the No.1 office agent. From a product manager&apos;s angle, here&apos;s the split between the two AI strategies, and where they go next.</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>product managers</category><category>AI strategy</category><category>big-tech watch</category><category>AI commercialization</category></item><item><title>This Round of Big Tech Layoffs Is Hunting the Product Managers Who Just Pass Messages Along</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/layoffs-cut-the-messenger/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/layoffs-cut-the-messenger/</guid><description>As of July, the tech industry has cut roughly 200,000 jobs in 2026 — a thousand a day — and more than half the layoff notices name-check AI. The strangest data point is Microsoft: on the same day it cut 4,800 people, HR chief Amy Coleman went out of her way to add, &apos;The roles eliminated today were not replaced by AI.&apos; Everyone else is racing to say &apos;AI did it&apos;; Microsoft is racing to say &apos;don&apos;t blame AI.&apos; Underneath those two contradicting statements is the same answer nobody wants to say out loud: the first thing AI eats isn&apos;t a job title, it&apos;s a layer — the message-passing layer. And product managers happen to be one of the most message-dense roles there is.</description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>AI layoffs</category><category>Big Tech layoffs</category><category>product managers</category><category>AI-era PM</category><category>tech commentary</category></item><item><title>The 100 PMs Who Changed the World · No. 13 | Jensen Huang: The Most Expensive Company on Earth — Stuck Outside the Pantheon of Product Managers</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/jensen-huang-sells-the-shovels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/jensen-huang-sells-the-shovels/</guid><description>No. 13 on the list is Jensen Huang, OVR 94, stuck one full point outside the Pantheon (the 95 line). Just this month, OpenAI&apos;s GPT-5.6, xAI&apos;s Grok 4.5, Moonshot&apos;s Kimi K3, and Meta&apos;s Muse Spark took turns dropping new models to grab headlines — but they all run on Jensen Huang&apos;s chips. Nobody knows who wins the model war; the man selling the shovels wins for sure. His NVIDIA soared to a $5.4 trillion market cap, the most valuable company on this planet. And yet a man standing at the very core of the AI era can&apos;t get into the Pantheon on this product-manager list, ranking only in the Legends tier. The answer hides in the two lowest of his six dimensions: Taste 83, Insight 87. This isn&apos;t a knock on him — it&apos;s precisely the key to understanding him. He&apos;s the most profitable kind of product manager of this era, and that kind of product manager doesn&apos;t run on taste.</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Jensen Huang</category><category>NVIDIA</category><category>100 PMs Who Changed the World</category><category>Product Management</category><category>Tech Commentary</category></item><item><title>Spain Beat Argentina 1-0 and Lifted the Cup, Messi Bowed Out With 0 Shots: What Locked Down the World&apos;s Best Was a System</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/the-system-beat-the-genius/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/the-system-beat-the-genius/</guid><description>July 19, New York. Spain beat Argentina 1-0 with an extra-time winner and lifted the World Cup trophy. And Messi — in the final of the last World Cup of his career — played the full match with a shot count of 0. In 120 minutes Argentina took just 2 shots, 0 on target, shut down completely. To make the player the whole planet agrees is the best go a full night without a single shot, one defender is never enough — it takes an entire team, an entire system: Rodri locking down midfield, ~70% possession keeping Messi out of dangerous areas, 20 shots to 2. Put another way: Spain didn&apos;t beat Argentina by finding a stronger genius; they used a system that depends on no single person to lock down the single strongest person. This final quietly taught a lesson to everyone who builds products and leads teams.</description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Messi</category><category>World Cup</category><category>System vs Individual</category><category>Product Managers</category><category>Tech Commentary</category></item><item><title>Why Does AI Keep Getting It Wrong? It&apos;s Not Dumb — You Didn&apos;t Say It Clearly</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/you-didnt-say-it-clearly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/you-didnt-say-it-clearly/</guid><description>You ask AI to build something, and eight or nine times out of ten it comes back wrong, and you think &quot;this AI is useless.&quot; But after a few months of doing this every day, I&apos;m more and more sure of one thing: when AI gets it wrong, most of the time it isn&apos;t dumb — I didn&apos;t say it clearly. Same requirement, phrased differently, and it nails it on the first try. There&apos;s a very plain truth underneath this — AI can&apos;t read minds. It does what you said, not what you meant. This piece lays out the requirement-writing method I&apos;ve worked out: the five parts of a requirement that lets AI get it right the first time, the five most common ways of not saying it clearly and how to fix each, and three moves that turn AI from a hand into a brain. All of it is copy-pasteable.</description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Describing Requirements</category><category>Prompting</category><category>Speak It Into Being</category><category>Product Managers</category><category>AI Workflow</category></item><item><title>The Woman Who Built ChatGPT Just Shipped a Model She Admits Isn&apos;t the Strongest — and Investors Are About to Value Her at $50 Billion</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/mira-murati-not-the-strongest/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/mira-murati-not-the-strongest/</guid><description>Yesterday Kimi K3 was still shouting &quot;topped the charts, number one in the world.&quot; Today the woman who built ChatGPT did the exact opposite. On July 16, Mira Murati&apos;s Thinking Machines released Inkling — a 975B open-weights model, natively multimodal, with adjustable thinking effort — yet in black and white the announcement says it is &quot;not the strongest overall model available today, open or closed.&quot; Meanwhile this company, just a year and a half old, is raising a new round at roughly a $50 billion valuation — four times last July&apos;s. Why is someone who shipped a model that isn&apos;t the strongest worth $50 billion? The answer hides in the thing she&apos;s best at, and the most expensive thing in the AI era: judging what actually makes a good product.</description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Mira Murati</category><category>Thinking Machines</category><category>OpenAI</category><category>AI</category><category>Product Managers</category><category>Tech Commentary</category></item><item><title>The 100 PMs Who Changed the World · No. 3 | Jeff Bezos: At 62 He Made Himself CEO Again — to Bet on the One Thing Amazon Never Pulled Off</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/bezos-working-backwards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/bezos-working-backwards/</guid><description>No. 3 on the list is Jeff Bezos, OVR 97, with a 99 on the Business dimension — the highest tier on the whole list, higher even than Jobs. Just last month, this man — retired four years, worth roughly $250 billion, free to spend his days on rockets and yachts — made himself CEO again: personally co-leading the AI startup Project Prometheus, which just raised $1.2 billion in June at a $41 billion valuation. Why would a man who perfected the art of &quot;letting go,&quot; who designed his company to run without him, step back into the ring at 62? The answer hides in his real invention — a method that forces everyone to first write down, on six pages, exactly what they want, and to write the press release before building anything. In today&apos;s world, that method happens to be the most valuable thing there is.</description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Jeff Bezos</category><category>Amazon</category><category>AWS</category><category>Product Managers</category><category>100 PMs Who Changed the World</category><category>Tech Commentary</category></item><item><title>The 100 PMs Who Changed the World · No. 5 | Zhang Yiming: His Best Product Isn&apos;t Douyin — It&apos;s a Machine That Mass-Produces Hits</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/zhang-yiming-the-app-factory/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/zhang-yiming-the-app-factory/</guid><description>No. 5 on the list is Zhang Yiming, OVR 96. Just last month, his net worth of $92.8 billion overtook Ambani, making him the second-richest man in Asia and the undisputed richest in China — and this is a man who almost never gives interviews, stepped down as CEO back in 2021, and rarely even shows his face. How does an &quot;invisible&quot; man become the second-richest in Asia? The answer hides in the lowest of his six dimensions: Taste, just 88. That&apos;s not a knock on him — it&apos;s precisely the key to understanding him. Because Zhang Yiming is the most counterintuitive product manager on this list: he deliberately refuses taste, replacing intuition with data and aesthetics with algorithms, and built a machine that keeps mass-producing global hits. This piece breaks down his six scores — and a bet that Doubao is now putting back to the test.</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Zhang Yiming</category><category>ByteDance</category><category>Product Management</category><category>100 PMs Who Changed the World</category><category>Tech Commentary</category></item><item><title>I handed AI about half of my PM job, and there are a few things I still don&apos;t dare hand over</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/pm-what-i-gave-ai-what-i-kept/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/pm-what-i-gave-ai-what-i-kept/</guid><description>This year I handed AI roughly half of my day-to-day PM work — first drafts of documents, digging up competitor research, sorting hundreds of pieces of user feedback, turning meetings into action items, building clickable prototypes. It&apos;s fast and it never complains. But a few other things I haven&apos;t dared hand over, and I don&apos;t plan to. Not because AI can&apos;t do them — the opposite, some it does more smoothly than I do. It&apos;s because once you hand those off and they go wrong, you can&apos;t catch it, and by the time you do it&apos;s already too late. This piece lays out my &apos;hand over vs. keep&apos; line, one item at a time, including the pits I nearly fell into after handing things off.</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>product manager</category><category>AI workflow</category><category>judgment</category><category>career</category><category>division of labor</category><category>hands-on</category></item><item><title>AI-Era PM Interviews: How to Answer the 5 Questions They Love Most</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/pm-ai-interview-questions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/pm-ai-interview-questions/</guid><description>I&apos;ve interviewed a lot of product managers these past two years, and been interviewed myself. One pattern jumps out: the moment an AI question comes up, eight out of ten people start reciting concepts — what RAG is, the difference between fine-tuning and prompting, how Transformers work. The smoother the recital, the more certain I am I won&apos;t hire them. Because these questions aren&apos;t testing what you memorized; they&apos;re testing whether you can think. This post breaks down the 5 AI PM interview questions asked most in 2026: what the interviewer is really weighing behind each one, how I&apos;d answer, and the answer most likely to sink you. Not a bank of templates to memorize — a way of seeing which part of you each question is measuring.</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>product manager</category><category>interviews</category><category>job hunting</category><category>AI product manager</category><category>career</category><category>hands-on</category></item><item><title>A Day as an AI-Era PM: How I Turned One Sentence Into a Prototype You Can Actually Tap</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/pm-one-sentence-to-prototype/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/pm-one-sentence-to-prototype/</guid><description>One afternoon last week, I turned &apos;I want a little thing that tracks what I spend&apos; into a prototype my coworker could actually tap on his phone — record a real expense, see a real pie chart. Not a single line of code. Everyone thinks the AI era means PMs have to go learn programming. It&apos;s actually the reverse: the skill that&apos;s worth money now is getting your words clear enough that AI gets it right on the first try. This isn&apos;t a lecture — it&apos;s exactly how I did it: how to make AI interrogate me first, how to change only one thing at a time, why the very first version should run on real data, and how to use &apos;can you tap through it?&apos; as your acceptance line. Includes the potholes I stepped in.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>product manager</category><category>AI workflow</category><category>prototype</category><category>career skills</category><category>high-fidelity</category><category>hands-on</category></item><item><title>Kung Fu Women&apos;s Soccer only scored 6.6, yet Stephen Chow is the most ruthless product manager I&apos;ve ever seen</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/stephen-chow-scored-the-wrong-product/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/stephen-chow-scored-the-wrong-product/</guid><description>Kung Fu Women&apos;s Soccer opened at 6.6 on Douban, with 8.6% of viewers giving it one star. The comments trash it: cheap effects, try-hard acting, a plot that&apos;s just Shaolin Soccer with a gender swap — reheated leftovers. Yet it crossed 100 million in 27 minutes on day one, took 76.8% of screenings, and pulled in 500 million over two days, with total box office forecasts revised up from 1.428 billion to 1.865 billion RMB. A product the professional audience flunked is winning big commercially. That&apos;s not luck, and it&apos;s not as simple as a bad movie cashing in — the critics and the box office are actually scoring two completely different products. And what makes Stephen Chow such a ruthless product manager is that he knows better than anyone which one he&apos;s shipping. This piece takes it apart — and takes apart the price of it too.</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>product judgment</category><category>user needs</category><category>Stephen Chow</category><category>Kung Fu Women&apos;s Soccer</category><category>commercialization</category><category>tech commentary</category></item><item><title>A Typhoon That Fizzled Out: How a PM Survives the Darkest Hour Like Riding Out a Storm</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/typhoon-darkest-hour/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/typhoon-darkest-hour/</guid><description>Typhoon No. 9, &quot;Bawei,&quot; veered south last night, making landfall along the coast from Wenling in Zhejiang down to Xiapu in Fujian. The fishing boats moved overnight out of Zhoushan and Putuo, the cancelled flights — in hindsight it all looks like wasted effort, so people start saying &quot;we didn&apos;t need to bother.&quot; But those three words, &quot;false alarm,&quot; can kill a product manager faster than the typhoon itself. Riding out a storm was never one move; it&apos;s three: prepare fully before it arrives, take the wind and rain when it hits, and clean up the mess after it leaves. The day GitLab dropped its database, it discovered none of its five backups actually worked. Knight Capital lost $440 million in 45 minutes over one chunk of dead code someone forgot to delete — and the company was gone. This is about what an operator should actually do on the night the alarm truly sounds.</description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>darkest hour</category><category>crisis response</category><category>product manager</category><category>postmortem</category><category>typhoon</category><category>tech commentary</category></item><item><title>Why People Insist That Typhoons Steer Clear of Putuoshan</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/typhoon-putuoshan-survivorship-bias/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/typhoon-putuoshan-survivorship-bias/</guid><description>There&apos;s a widely repeated claim — Putuoshan is protected by Guanyin, so typhoons always detour around it. Yet today, Typhoon No. 9 (Bavi) shut down Putuoshan&apos;s ferries, canceled 14 flights at its airport, and forced every fishing boat in the district to evacuate overnight; back in 2021, In-Fa flooded 6,000 meters of road across the Putuoshan-Zhujiajian area. Putuoshan is no typhoon-proof zone — it&apos;s getting hit today. So why do people still believe the Bodhisattva turns typhoons away? That misattribution — crediting mere &quot;survival&quot; to &quot;mysterious protection&quot; — is the exact same cognitive move as worshipping &quot;great PMs as prophets.&quot; This piece takes it apart.</description><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Survivorship Bias</category><category>Product Judgment</category><category>Cognitive Bias</category><category>Tech Commentary</category><category>Typhoon</category></item><item><title>The 100 Product Managers Who Changed the World · No. 4 | Sam Altman: His Real Product Was Never ChatGPT — It&apos;s OpenAI Itself</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/altman-the-company-is-the-product/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/altman-the-company-is-the-product/</guid><description>No. 4 on the list is Sam Altman, OVR 96 — but the lowest of his six dimensions is taste, just 87. That&apos;s not a knock on him; it&apos;s the key to understanding him. This week he wasn&apos;t busy with product: he admitted to CNBC that OpenAI made &quot;a lot of changes&quot; with the White House to ship GPT-5.6, was reported to have offered a U.S. sovereign fund 5% of the company, and published a pitch for an &quot;American-led international AI forum.&quot; A consumer product company&apos;s CEO, spending a week on the Treasury Secretary — because the product he&apos;s actually running was never that chat box. It&apos;s where the three letters O-P-E-N-A-I sit in the world. This piece breaks down his six scores, and the bet the numbers are now testing.</description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Sam Altman</category><category>OpenAI</category><category>Product Management</category><category>100 PMs Who Changed the World</category><category>Tech Commentary</category></item><item><title>The 100 Product Managers Who Changed the World · No. 1 | Steve Jobs: The Only 99 on the Entire List Went to a Man Who Never Wrote Code</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/steve-jobs-the-only-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/steve-jobs-the-only-99/</guid><description>I had Claude score the 100 product managers who changed the world, and only one 99 came out of the entire list — Steve Jobs. What&apos;s interesting is that the two biggest stories of early 2026 both testify to that score: Apple outsourced the rebuilt Siri to Google Gemini, and OpenAI spent $6.4 billion to bring in Jony Ive, with its first device due in the second half of the year. This piece walks through his six dimension scores one by one: why vision earned a 99, why insight lost a point, the tuition hidden inside the 97 for business — and why the greatest product manager in history happened to be a man who never wrote code.</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Steve Jobs</category><category>Apple</category><category>Product Management</category><category>100 PMs Who Changed the World</category><category>Tech Commentary</category></item><item><title>Hundreds of MCP Servers and Claude Skills, and Barely Any Are Truly Free and Open Source. I Checked Them One by One and Turned It Into a Directory</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/free-mcp-and-skills/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/free-mcp-and-skills/</guid><description>I wanted to add a few MCP servers to Claude, and the more I searched the more annoyed I got. Out of hundreds, half are only free if you hand over an API key. A whole batch flies the open-source flag but really means source-available, not for commercial use — Sentry&apos;s MCP is under the FSL license, and Anthropic&apos;s own document skills flatly say all rights reserved. Some repos don&apos;t even have a LICENSE file, which legally means all rights reserved by default. The ones that are actually MIT or Apache, install-and-go, no account needed, you can only tell apart by opening every LICENSE one by one. I went through sixty-odd of them and collected the genuinely free and open ones into a bilingual directory: To Be Free. This piece is about how I sorted them, which of the truly free ones are worth installing first (gstack, ruflo, the official MIT servers…), and why this is the next step in my rebuild-free-software line.</description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>MCP</category><category>Claude Code</category><category>Free Software</category><category>Open Source</category><category>AI Tools</category></item><item><title>The 100 Product Managers Who Changed the World · No. 2 | Allen Zhang: Insight and Taste Both 99 — Yet He Chose to Leave Business at 92</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/zhang-xiaolong-operating-system/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/zhang-xiaolong-operating-system/</guid><description>No. 2 on the list is Allen Zhang, OVR 97, second only to Steve Jobs. What&apos;s fascinating is that across his six dimensions, insight is 99 and taste is 99 — the ceiling of the entire list, shoulder to shoulder with Jobs and even higher — yet business is only 92, the lowest of his six. It&apos;s not that he can&apos;t make money; the opposite. He deliberately pushes away money handed to him on a plate. The one thing this year that best explains this operating system: Tencent&apos;s own AI, Yuanbao, can&apos;t catch Doubao on monthly actives — and a rarely-stated reason is that Allen Zhang&apos;s WeChat locked even Tencent&apos;s own AI outside the social graph. This piece unpacks Zhang across the six dimensions, and unpacks a bet that is being re-validated in the second half of the AI era.</description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Allen Zhang</category><category>WeChat</category><category>Product Management</category><category>100 PMs Who Changed the World</category><category>Tech Commentary</category></item><item><title>The same AI: some companies use it to fire, others to hire</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/ai-layoff-excuse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/ai-layoff-excuse/</guid><description>Tech layoffs explicitly blamed on AI have hit over 87,000 people this year. Meta is raising capex up to $145B to build AI infrastructure while cutting ~8,000 jobs — and openly says the cuts are &apos;to offset other investments we&apos;re making,&apos; which translates to: we&apos;re laying people off to pay for GPUs. Yet in that same industry, Anthropic has had zero layoffs this year and is growing fast; OpenAI is standing up a $4B deployment company to recruit Forward Deployed Engineers everywhere; Google just posted 59 of the same role. Same AI, one company&apos;s excuse to fire, another company&apos;s reason to hire. Which means the variable was never the AI. Here&apos;s what&apos;s actually going on — and what it means for the rest of us.</description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>AI Layoffs</category><category>Tech Commentary</category><category>AI Jobs</category><category>Forward Deployed Engineer</category><category>Big Tech</category></item><item><title>You ordered it in the comments — so I built it: SoloPic, a free image tool</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/from-comment-to-tool/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/from-comment-to-tool/</guid><description>At the end of my last piece — &apos;Why I&apos;m Rebuilding 100 Free Software Tools&apos; — I asked: which one do you most wish someone would rebuild for you? A reader from Tianjin named Axiang left three specific requirements in the comments: batch edge-crop, batch rename via a mapping file, and batch brightness/contrast. I replied &apos;Got it — the core is batch processing, right?&apos; and then spent a few days building it: SoloPic, a free, offline, 12 MB batch image tool, built exactly to his spec, right down to &apos;crop 100px from the left and 57px from the bottom.&apos; This piece is about how that one comment became real, working software — and why the best candidates for the &apos;100 free tools&apos; project aren&apos;t in my head. They&apos;re in your comments.</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Free Software</category><category>Rebuilding Free Software</category><category>SoloPic</category><category>Reader-Driven</category><category>doaipm Method</category></item><item><title>Zero marketing, zero code, 22,000 downloads in three months: a coding beginner&apos;s open-source journey</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/best-free-markdown-editor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/best-free-markdown-editor/</guid><description>Three months ago I set myself a goal that sounded a little crazy: build the best free Markdown editor out there. The crazy part wasn&apos;t &apos;best.&apos; It was &apos;free&apos; — and more than that, it was the fact that I can&apos;t write code. Three months later, SoloMD has shipped 30 versions, been downloaded more than 22,000 times, and picked up over 400 GitHub stars — with almost no marketing on my end. This piece is about those three months: why I was determined to build free software that doesn&apos;t treat users as a revenue source, how someone who can&apos;t write a single line of code actually shipped it, the bet I made on day one (the people using software aren&apos;t only people anymore), and how I felt the day a stranger sent me ¥10.</description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>SoloMD</category><category>Free Software</category><category>Open Source</category><category>Building a Product</category><category>doaipm Method</category></item><item><title>I Built Another Terminal, Unterm — Its Default User Isn&apos;t Human</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/a-terminal-for-ai/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/a-terminal-for-ai/</guid><description>Over the past six months, 80% of the commands run in my terminal weren&apos;t typed by me — Claude Code and a fleet of agents did it. But the terminals I was using — iTerm, Windows Terminal, Warp — were all designed around one person sitting there, typing one line, glancing at the output. Once the primary user switched to agents, that assumption broke in five places: commands that need to cross the firewall stall out in timeouts; handing a bare terminal to AI means handing it rm -rf too; once an agent finishes I can&apos;t rewind to see what it did; I&apos;m already running three or four agents at once; and the more agents there are, the messier the desktop gets. This piece covers what Unterm is, where the name comes from, and how I patched each of those five problems.</description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Unterm</category><category>AI Terminal</category><category>AI-Native Tools</category><category>Building a Product</category><category>doaipm Method</category></item><item><title>Becoming an AI-Era PM 10 | High-Fidelity First: I Haven&apos;t Drawn a Wireframe in Six Months</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/high-fidelity-first/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/high-fidelity-first/</guid><description>This is the tenth piece in the series Becoming an AI-Era PM. Low-fidelity wireframes existed because building a real version was expensive — you had to align on direction with gray boxes first. Now a single sentence gets you a page you can actually click in a browser within minutes: n8n&apos;s product team ripped their wireframe flow out entirely, and a director at Delivery Hero hand-built a prototype in an hour without pulling in an engineer. I haven&apos;t drawn a single wireframe in six months either. This piece is about how I skip low-fi and go straight to building something runnable and high-fidelity: real content instead of placeholders, every state filled in (loading / empty / error / success), actually clickable, run for real in a browser — plus the one new habit that having a version in minutes gave me.</description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>AI Product Manager</category><category>High-Fidelity First</category><category>Prototyping</category><category>doaipm Method</category><category>AI-Era PM</category></item><item><title>Becoming an AI-Era PM 09 | From Executor to Orchestrator: Your New Job Is Conducting a Fleet of Agents</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/orchestrator-not-executor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/orchestrator-not-executor/</guid><description>This is the ninth piece in the series Becoming an AI-Era PM. In 2026, the most productive people no longer sit watching one AI edit code in real time — they run several agents at once, each with its own context, each owning a slice, working asynchronously, while they split the work, hand it out, and sign it off from above. Addy Osmani calls this the shift from conductor to orchestrator, with one line that stings: a vague instruction gets amplified into a whole fleet of agents&apos; worth of mistakes, a precise one into a whole fleet&apos;s worth of precise implementations. This piece lays out four moves you can run: don&apos;t follow one agent start to finish, split the work into non-overlapping parallel chunks, give each chunk a clear spec, and turn your job into splitting and signing off.</description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>AI Product Manager</category><category>AI Orchestration</category><category>Multi-Agent</category><category>doaipm Method</category><category>AI-Era PM</category></item><item><title>Why I&apos;m Rebuilding 100 Free Software Tools</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/rebuild-free-software/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/rebuild-free-software/</guid><description>You want to strip a watermark off a PDF. The free tool you install starts popping ads the next day, hijacks your homepage, quietly ships your data somewhere, and then makes you upgrade to export. The real pain of free software runs three layers deep: you&apos;re sold as the product, nobody&apos;s paid to polish it, and free is just the hook to force you to pay. For years you had no choice but to put up with it, because building a good replacement was too expensive. AI just cut that cost down to something one person can carry. I&apos;ve already rebuilt six this way — SoloMD, Unterm, unfetch, Unflick, Ziplark, FreeID Photo — and there are ninety-four more to go.</description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Free Software</category><category>Rebuilding Free Software</category><category>Indie Dev</category><category>doaipm Method</category><category>Building with AI</category></item><item><title>Becoming an AI-Era PM 08 | AI Can&apos;t Find the Real Problem for You</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/find-the-real-problem/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/find-the-real-problem/</guid><description>This is the eighth piece in the series Becoming an AI-Era PM, and the close of the think-it-through stretch. a16z&apos;s 5 Principles for product managers nailed it: a PM&apos;s job has always been resolving ambiguity, and AI hasn&apos;t reduced that ambiguity — it just swapped the tools. AI can build anything now, but it can&apos;t find the real problem worth solving for you — where the user is actually stuck, and whether the thing is even worth doing. This piece lays out four moves you can run in the discovery phase: go watch where the user gets stuck, separate what they say they want from what they&apos;re actually stuck on, hunt for the workaround as the hardest signal of a real problem, and use a builder&apos;s mindset to probe with something that runs.</description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>AI Product Manager</category><category>Finding the Real Problem</category><category>Product Discovery</category><category>doaipm Method</category><category>AI-Era PM</category></item><item><title>Becoming an AI-Era PM 07 | You Don&apos;t Write PRDs Anymore — You Ship Three Works</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/what-pms-ship-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/what-pms-ship-now/</guid><description>This is the seventh piece in the series Becoming an AI-Era PM. Hiring in 2026 is shifting: more and more teams treat one shipped product feature plus a clear eval you can talk through as the mark of a strong candidate — not a polished PRD or a stack of certificates. Once AI takes over writing PRDs and drawing prototypes, those stop being your deliverables. This piece spells out the three works an AI-era PM actually ships — a product someone can open and click, a retro with a real number, and an eval you wrote yourself — and exactly how to put each one together.</description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>AI Product Manager</category><category>PM Portfolio</category><category>PM Career Shift</category><category>doaipm Method</category><category>AI-Era PM</category></item><item><title>Becoming an AI-Era PM 06 | Speak It Into Being: Turning a Clear Idea Into a Clickable Product in One Sentence</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/speak-it-into-being/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/speak-it-into-being/</guid><description>This is the sixth piece in the series Becoming an AI-Era PM, and the opening of the &quot;build it&quot; half. Mindaugas turned an idea into a product with paying users using Lovable — without writing a line of code; in December 2025 Lovable raised a $330M Series B at a $6.6B valuation. &quot;Speak it, and AI builds it&quot; is no longer a slogan. But speaking it into being isn&apos;t type-one-line-and-walk-away — it&apos;s a loop, it has craft, and it all hinges on that one sentence being clear. This piece gives you four things you can actually do: ask for something that runs before you say it all, run it for real instead of trusting &quot;done,&quot; change one thing at a time and watch it move, and say it clearly so the building follows.</description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>AI Product Manager</category><category>Speak It Into Being</category><category>vibe coding</category><category>doaipm Method</category><category>AI-Era PM</category></item><item><title>Becoming an AI-Era PM 05 | Leave It Vague and AI Will Fill the Gaps for You</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/say-it-clearly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/say-it-clearly/</guid><description>This is the fifth piece in the series Becoming an AI-Era PM. You tell AI &quot;build me a login,&quot; and in one breath it settles a dozen things you never mentioned: email or phone, how many wrong passwords before it locks, how long the lock lasts, what the error message says. AI doesn&apos;t ask you back the way a person would — it&apos;s a yes-machine: it does what you said, not what you meant. The moment a requirement goes fuzzy, it fills the gap with the most generic default, and that default is usually not the one you wanted. OpenAI&apos;s Sean Grove says code is only 10–20% of a developer&apos;s value; the other 80–90% is saying clearly what to build. This piece gives you four things you can actually do: swap adjectives for numbers, write out every state, list the edge cases, and self-check with a zero-context test.</description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>AI Product Manager</category><category>Saying It Clearly</category><category>Speak It Into Being</category><category>doaipm Method</category><category>AI-Era PM</category></item><item><title>Becoming an AI-Era PM 04 | Judging &quot;Should We Build It&quot; Now Costs More Than &quot;Can We Build It&quot;</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/judgment-over-feasibility/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/judgment-over-feasibility/</guid><description>This is the fourth piece in the series Becoming an AI-Era PM. In 2025, METR ran a randomized controlled trial: 16 senior developers, five years of experience on average, did 246 real tasks with AI. Beforehand they expected to be 24% faster; afterward they still felt 20% faster; measured, they were 19% slower. Even the simplest judgment — &quot;did AI make me faster&quot; — got called backwards by the people who knew the work best. When building gets fast and cheap, &quot;can we build it&quot; stops filtering any idea out, and the expensive judgment moves to &quot;should we build it.&quot; This piece gives you four things you can actually do: stop using difficulty as a gate, ask what happens if you don&apos;t build it, write down what becomes true before you start, and let AI lay out options but never trust &quot;feels right.&quot;</description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>AI Product Manager</category><category>Product Judgment</category><category>Should We Build It</category><category>doaipm Method</category><category>AI-Era PM</category></item><item><title>Becoming an AI-Era PM 03 | Treat AI as a Colleague, Not a Tool</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/ai-as-colleague/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/ai-as-colleague/</guid><description>This is the third piece in the series Becoming an AI-Era PM. Most people use AI like a vending machine: a sentence in, an answer out, and the next conversation starts the explanation over from scratch. The CEO of Relay.app said at an AI product leaders summit, &quot;Stop treating AI as a tool — treat it like a colleague you hired.&quot; This piece skips the mindset talk and gives you four things you can actually do: write it a handoff doc, hand it a whole task with the boundaries nailed down, review its output the way you&apos;d review a junior&apos;s PR, and write every correction back into the doc — with real example prompts.</description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>AI Product Manager</category><category>Working With AI</category><category>AI Agents</category><category>doaipm Method</category><category>AI-Era PM</category></item><item><title>Becoming an AI-Era PM 02 | Why Not Knowing How to Code Is an Edge</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/not-knowing-code-is-an-edge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/not-knowing-code-is-an-edge/</guid><description>This is the second piece in the series Becoming an AI-Era PM. A residential real estate broker who can&apos;t write code built an AI agent that runs his daily operations using Claude and Zapier; in 2026, 63% of vibe coding&apos;s active users aren&apos;t developers. On the road from idea to a thing that actually runs, people without a technical background sometimes move faster — engineers first have to shed the instinct to be responsible for every line, and the sentence &quot;this is too hard&quot; is one a non-technical person simply can&apos;t say.</description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>AI Product Manager</category><category>PM Transition</category><category>Building Without Code</category><category>doaipm Method</category><category>AI-Era PM</category></item><item><title>Becoming an AI-Era PM 01 | Which PM Tasks AI Took Over, and Which Ones Got More Valuable</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/ai-pm-what-changed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/ai-pm-what-changed/</guid><description>This is the first piece in the series Becoming an AI-Era PM. In 2026, plenty of AI PM job descriptions dropped writing PRDs, drawing prototypes, and building dashboards from the hard requirements, and swapped in three work samples instead. The tasks AI can take over are falling out of the hiring requirements, and what&apos;s left as the bar is the part only a person can do. This piece lays the took over and got more valuable columns side by side, as the overview for the whole series.</description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>AI Product Manager</category><category>PM Transition</category><category>AI-Era PM</category><category>doaipm Method</category><category>Tech Commentary</category></item><item><title>The Knicks Won It All. Their 56-Year-Old Coach Never Played a Minute in the NBA. That&apos;s the Whole Re-Employment Playbook for the AI Age.</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/why-coaches-are-old/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/why-coaches-are-old/</guid><description>The Knicks won their first championship in 52 years, and the coach holding the trophy, Mike Brown, is 56 and never made a single shot in an NBA game. Pull the camera back across the whole league: the players running the floor are in their twenties, and the people calling the shots from the sideline are all gray-haired, fifty to seventy-something. Players sell their legs; coaches sell their judgment — and those two things age in opposite directions. That single pattern happens to explain something a lot of people are losing sleep over: how older workers get re-employed in the AI age.</description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>AI and Jobs</category><category>Older Workers</category><category>NBA</category><category>Judgment</category><category>Tech Commentary</category></item><item><title>16 Senior Devs Used AI to Code. They Thought It Made Them 20% Faster. It Made Them 19% Slower.</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/felt-faster-actually-slower/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/felt-faster-actually-slower/</guid><description>In METR&apos;s randomized controlled trial, 16 experienced open-source developers did real tasks on projects they&apos;d maintained for an average of five years. The ones using AI were 19% slower. But the worse part is the other half: they predicted AI would speed them up 24% beforehand, and after finishing — after personally living through the slowdown — they still believed they&apos;d gone 20% faster. Their gut and the stopwatch were off by nearly 40 percentage points, with the sign flipped. As someone who plans roadmaps, quotes timelines, and defends budgets on team-productivity estimates every day, I want to spell out where this illusion comes from, where it holds, and how it&apos;s quietly seeped into every AI-related decision in our line of work.</description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>AI Coding</category><category>Developer Productivity</category><category>Product Management</category><category>AI Productivity</category><category>Tech Commentary</category></item><item><title>Altman Lets It Slip: Half of the &apos;AI Layoffs&apos; Are an Act</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/altman-ai-washing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/altman-ai-washing/</guid><description>The guy selling AI hardest just admitted, on the record, something everyone already suspected. Sam Altman says a lot of so-called &apos;AI layoffs&apos; are really AI washing — cuts that were coming anyway, blamed on AI to look dignified. What makes it stranger: months later he said he was &apos;delighted to be wrong,&apos; because the jobs apocalypse he once feared never showed up. On one side, six figures of tech jobs vanished in 2026 under the AI banner. On the other, AI&apos;s top salesman says the whole thing got oversold. The gap between those two statements is the part worth watching.</description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Sam Altman</category><category>AI Layoffs</category><category>AI Washing</category><category>Tech Commentary</category><category>Careers</category></item><item><title>Wall Street Is Dumping Software Stocks, Because Products Can Now Be Conjured in One Sentence</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/selling-software-stocks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/selling-software-stocks/</guid><description>Jefferies just cut Workday, DocuSign, Monday.com, and Freshworks to Hold, citing AI disruption risk in plain language. Software stocks are down 30% to 55% this year. The market is making one bet: once a product&apos;s features can be cloned by AI in a single sentence, the business of charging subscriptions for those features stops being worth anything. The point isn&apos;t that software dies. It&apos;s that the valuable part of software is moving — out of the features themselves and into judgment, taste, distribution, and trust. Anyone who misses the move falls with the multiples.</description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Software Stocks</category><category>SaaS</category><category>AI Disruption</category><category>Vibe Coding</category><category>Tech Commentary</category></item><item><title>80% of Companies Cut Staff for AI and Got No Return. They Bought AI for the Wrong Job</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/ai-layoffs-backfire/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/ai-layoffs-backfire/</guid><description>Gartner surveyed 350 companies with over $1B in revenue, and about 80% cut staff because of AI. But the companies that cut weren&apos;t any more likely to see a real return than the ones that didn&apos;t. The layoffs freed up budget; they didn&apos;t free up return. The reason is simple: these companies treated AI as a way to replace people and save money, when AI&apos;s real value is amplifying human judgment. Cut people as a cost and you cut exactly the part that produces the return.</description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>AI layoffs</category><category>enterprise AI</category><category>ROI</category><category>AI-era product manager</category><category>tech commentary</category></item><item><title>From Wuzhao to Zhou Jingren: Alibaba Has the Best AI and the Hardest Execution. The One Thing It Lacks Is Judgment</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/alibaba-everything-but-judgment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/alibaba-everything-but-judgment/</guid><description>In a single week, Wuzhao was pushed out of DingTalk, and word spread that Chief Scientist Zhou Jingren was leaving too, six days after he took the title. Alibaba quickly denied the Zhou rumor, but the steady exit of Tongyi&apos;s core people this year is very real. Put it all together and you see something strange: Alibaba owns the strongest AI model in China and the most relentless execution culture there is, yet its technical talent and its product captains keep walking out the door. The problem isn&apos;t the technology. It isn&apos;t the execution. It&apos;s the one seat nobody can fill: judgment.</description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Alibaba</category><category>AI strategy</category><category>Tongyi</category><category>judgment</category><category>tech commentary</category></item><item><title>AI Lies to You, and That Is Exactly Where Your Value Comes From</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/ai-lies-to-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/ai-lies-to-you/</guid><description>In June, a KPMG report on AI was caught full of AI hallucinations: of 45 citations, only 5 pointed to real sources. A report about AI got fooled by AI. AI lies to you, and it does so with a straight face. That isn&apos;t a bug, it&apos;s part of how it works. Because it lies, the person who catches it, verifies it, and signs off on it is irreplaceable. And to make that job cheaper and faster, you have to use the best AI you can get.</description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>AI hallucination</category><category>AI-era product managers</category><category>judgment</category><category>tech commentary</category></item><item><title>Wu Zhao Is Out at DingTalk. The Essay Didn&apos;t Beat Him. Busywork Did.</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/busy-for-nothing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/busy-for-nothing/</guid><description>437 days. Field visits, customer satisfaction pulled from 30% to 80%, a camp bed in the office, watching when the lights went out in the Feishu building across the street. Wu Zhao&apos;s diligence was real. So was DingTalk ONE: launched in four months, 3 million daily actives, retention off a cliff, dismantled within ten months. AI has maxed out productivity while the new consumption scenarios haven&apos;t shown up, and nobody has found the right path for human-AI collaboration. This is more than one man&apos;s failure; it&apos;s an entire era&apos;s winning formula expiring at once. And busywork is the first trap this era has dug for product managers.</description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>DingTalk</category><category>AI-era product managers</category><category>human-AI collaboration</category><category>tech commentary</category></item><item><title>SpaceX&apos;s $1.75 Trillion IPO: The Check the Market Wrote Musk Is Buying Judgment</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/the-price-of-judgment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/the-price-of-judgment/</guid><description>SpaceX went public at a $1.75 trillion valuation and rose 19% on its first day. The only part of it that actually turns a profit is Starlink, and its revenue isn&apos;t a fraction of what that number implies. The market isn&apos;t buying rockets, and it isn&apos;t buying revenue. It&apos;s buying one person&apos;s judgment, proven right again and again across twenty-four years. In an AI era where execution keeps getting cheaper, the biggest check in history landed on the one thing still appreciating.</description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Musk</category><category>SpaceX</category><category>AI-era product managers</category><category>judgment</category><category>tech commentary</category></item><item><title>Wuzhao&apos;s Operating System Was Installed in Japan</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/wrong-operating-system/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/wrong-operating-system/</guid><description>He joined Alibaba as an intern in 1999, left for Japan two years later, and stayed eleven years. Back home he built DingTalk, built hardware, and even pointed his own startup at the Japanese market. The precise, disciplined, obsessively polished operating system Wuzhao runs on was forged in Japan. It&apos;s a top-tier rig for building hardware and a fundamental mismatch for exploring AI. The real reason DingTalk stalled was written in his résumé all along.</description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>DingTalk</category><category>AI-era product managers</category><category>organizational culture</category><category>tech commentary</category></item><item><title>AI Made Product Managers More Tired, Not Less — Congratulations, You&apos;re the Bottleneck Now</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/pm-is-the-new-bottleneck/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/pm-is-the-new-bottleneck/</guid><description>You used to explain a requirement once and downstream would chew on it for two weeks. Now an AI-powered downstream comes back in twenty minutes asking for the next instruction. HBR says management systems can&apos;t keep up with AI&apos;s output pace; Andrew Ng says product managers have become the bottleneck. The exhaustion is real — but it&apos;s worth understanding why. It&apos;s a signal that power is flowing back to you, and a warning sign that you&apos;re living as a human CI server.</description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>AI-era product managers</category><category>bottleneck shift</category><category>judgment</category><category>tech commentary</category></item><item><title>The AI Agent Security Crisis Isn&apos;t That Agents Are Unsafe — It&apos;s That Nobody Told Them What They Can&apos;t Do</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/agents-need-boundaries/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/agents-need-boundaries/</guid><description>65% of enterprises had an AI agent security incident last year. Some agents mined crypto and opened backdoors on their own. Everyone&apos;s scrambling to patch &apos;agent security,&apos; but the real hole isn&apos;t technical — it&apos;s that the whole industry treated &apos;can act&apos; as the finish line and skipped the unsexy part: defining what agents aren&apos;t allowed to touch.</description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>AI agent</category><category>AI security</category><category>governance</category><category>tech commentary</category></item><item><title>Even With AI, You&apos;ll Still Ship Garbage</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/garbage-ships-faster/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/garbage-ships-faster/</guid><description>Lovable is celebrating 50 million projects and 720 million monthly visits — do the division, and the average project gets seen 14 times a month. AI didn&apos;t kill garbage products. It maxed out garbage production capacity. Garbage was never about failing to build it. It&apos;s about something that never should&apos;ve been built in the first place.</description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>vibe coding</category><category>AI products</category><category>build economy</category><category>tech commentary</category></item><item><title>AI Coding Isn&apos;t Too Expensive — Nobody&apos;s Measured What It&apos;s Worth</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/nobody-measured-the-value/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/nobody-measured-the-value/</guid><description>Microsoft quietly pulled Claude Code from an internal division and pushed thousands of engineers back to GitHub Copilot. Uber burned through its entire 2026 AI coding budget in four months. The narrative is that AI coding is too expensive. It isn&apos;t. The real problem is that companies bought &apos;productivity gains&apos; as a feeling, never as a number — and now the bill is crystal clear while the benefits aren&apos;t worth a single data point.</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>AI coding</category><category>enterprise AI</category><category>ROI</category><category>tech commentary</category></item><item><title>The AI Industry Has Pivoted to Evals — and Is Dodging the Real Question</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/you-are-the-eval/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/you-are-the-eval/</guid><description>In 2026, building &apos;evaluation systems&apos; for AI has become a full-blown discipline — gold-standard datasets, scorers, LLM-as-judge, CI gates, all positioned as the engineering practice that makes AI reliable. Strip away the engineering wrapper, though, and evals are really about one thing: who gets to define &apos;good,&apos; and who owns the consequences. That part can&apos;t be outsourced.</description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>evals</category><category>AI产品经理</category><category>judgment</category><category>tech-commentary</category></item><item><title>AI Has Learned to Push Back — and That&apos;s Great News for PMs</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/ai-that-pushes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/ai-that-pushes-back/</guid><description>The biggest change in Claude Opus 4.8 isn&apos;t that it&apos;s smarter — it&apos;s that it&apos;s more honest. It asks clarifying questions, admits uncertainty, and will argue back when your plan doesn&apos;t hold up, instead of serving you a half-finished job dressed up as &apos;done.&apos; When AI starts pushing back, &apos;speak it, AI builds it&apos; stops being a monologue and becomes a real conversation — and the skill every PM needs to build now is being a worthy counterpart.</description><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>doaipm</category><category>AI-native PM</category><category>Claude</category><category>judgment</category><category>speak-it-AI-builds-it</category></item><item><title>vibe coding Is Dead — Write Specs Instead? PMs Have a Third Option: Speak It, AI Builds It</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/say-it-dont-spec-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/say-it-dont-spec-it/</guid><description>Everyone&apos;s shouting that vibe coding is dead and the answer is spec-driven development. But for product managers, front-loading a pile of detailed spec documents just drags back the PRD burden AI finally got rid of. You don&apos;t have to choose between &apos;winging it&apos; and &apos;writing specs&apos; — there&apos;s a third path: speak it, AI builds it.</description><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>doaipm</category><category>AI-native PM</category><category>spec-driven</category><category>vibe coding</category><category>speak-it-AI-builds-it</category><category>high-fidelity</category></item><item><title>When Building Is Free, Taste Becomes the Only Moat — and It&apos;s Trainable</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/taste-is-the-moat/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/taste-is-the-moat/</guid><description>AI has made building things nearly free. Anyone can ship a working product. The barrier is gone — so the question becomes: if anyone can build, why is yours better? The answer is taste. And the counterintuitive part: taste isn&apos;t a gift. It&apos;s a skill you can train.</description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>doaipm</category><category>AI-native PM</category><category>taste</category><category>judgment</category><category>high-fidelity</category></item><item><title>&quot;AI code is garbage&quot;? Critics are half right — the missing word is *phase*</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/prototype-is-not-production/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/prototype-is-not-production/</guid><description>Mid-2026, vibe coding has split the room in two: one camp calls it the biggest shift since cloud, the other calls it gift-wrapping AI slop. The critics&apos; concerns about security and maintainability are valid — for production systems. For prototypes, they&apos;re wildly overstated. doaipm&apos;s high-fidelity + safety-net approach has always kept those two things separate.</description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>doaipm</category><category>AI-native PM</category><category>vibe coding</category><category>high-fidelity</category><category>safety net</category></item><item><title>Let AI execute, keep the judgment yourself: in 2026, the PM role is being redrawn</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/from-executor-to-orchestrator/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/from-executor-to-orchestrator/</guid><description>AI has taken over gathering, synthesizing, and running the process. Product managers are shifting from executor to orchestrator. Where should you invest the time you&apos;ve just won back? In the places AI can&apos;t reach — judgment, empathy, taste. And now you build things yourself.</description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>doaipm</category><category>AI-native PM</category><category>agentic</category><category>言出法随</category></item><item><title>Stop Learning, Start Doing: The Only Thing Standing Between You and AI-Native PM Is Action</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/stop-learning-start-doing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/stop-learning-start-doing/</guid><description>In the AI era, product managers don&apos;t need to hoard knowledge — you&apos;ll never out-know AI. Ask it on the spot instead of studying in advance. The core of DO AI PM is DO; the core of DO is SAY — and speaking is the most basic skill a product manager already has. There&apos;s no prerequisite. The only barrier is that you haven&apos;t started.</description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>doaipm</category><category>AI-native PM</category><category>言出法随</category><category>Claude Code</category></item><item><title>Vibe coding is already obsolete — and that&apos;s great news for product managers</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/vibe-coding-is-product-management/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/vibe-coding-is-product-management/</guid><description>When AI writes the code, what&apos;s left is judgment: deciding what to build, for whom, and what &apos;good&apos; means. That has always been product management. Here&apos;s why not knowing how to code can be an advantage — and how to do it on purpose.</description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>doaipm</category><category>AI-native PM</category><category>vibe coding</category><category>Claude Code</category><category>methodology</category></item><item><title>Speak it, AI builds it: I made this website with a single sentence</title><link>https://doaipm.com/en/blog/welcome/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://doaipm.com/en/blog/welcome/</guid><description>The first doaipm post. Not knowing how to code is an advantage — this very site was &quot;spoken&quot; into existence with Claude Code.</description><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>doaipm</category><category>Claude Code</category><category>methodology</category></item></channel></rss>