TAG

# tech commentary

← All tags · 31 post(s)

2026-07-28

CXMT Jumped 466% on Day One. The Company Has No Product Manager

On July 27, 2026, ChangXin Memory listed on the STAR Market and closed up 465.82% at a 3.28 trillion yuan valuation, raising 57.9 billion yuan — the largest IPO in STAR Market history. Three years ago it lost 16.7 billion; cumulative losses hit 36.65 billion. This year it made 24.7 billion in a single quarter. DRAM specs are written by JEDEC and prices are set by the cycle. In twenty years, not one of Zhu Yiming's key decisions was a product decision.

CXMT Jumped 466% on Day One. The Company Has No Product Manager
2026-07-26

The TIME Cover Shows a $650,000 Mecha. Wang Xingxing's Best Seller Costs Under $5,000

On July 23, Wang Xingxing and the GD01 manned mecha landed on the cover of TIME. But inside the issue sits a different set of numbers, and those are the ones product people should read: robot dogs down from $45,000 to under $2,000 in six years, the R1 under $5,000 — and 74% of shipments going to universities and labs. The product he is really pushing is the price curve.

The TIME Cover Shows a $650,000 Mecha. Wang Xingxing's Best Seller Costs Under $5,000
2026-07-22

This Round of Big Tech Layoffs Is Hunting the Product Managers Who Just Pass Messages Along

As of July, the tech industry has cut roughly 200,000 jobs in 2026 — a thousand a day — and more than half the layoff notices name-check AI. The strangest data point is Microsoft: on the same day it cut 4,800 people, HR chief Amy Coleman went out of her way to add, 'The roles eliminated today were not replaced by AI.' Everyone else is racing to say 'AI did it'; Microsoft is racing to say 'don't blame AI.' Underneath those two contradicting statements is the same answer nobody wants to say out loud: the first thing AI eats isn't a job title, it's a layer — the message-passing layer. And product managers happen to be one of the most message-dense roles there is.

This Round of Big Tech Layoffs Is Hunting the Product Managers Who Just Pass Messages Along
2026-07-21

The 100 PMs Who Changed the World · No. 13 | Jensen Huang: The Most Expensive Company on Earth — Stuck Outside the Pantheon of Product Managers

No. 13 on the list is Jensen Huang, OVR 94, stuck one full point outside the Pantheon (the 95 line). Just this month, OpenAI's GPT-5.6, xAI's Grok 4.5, Moonshot's Kimi K3, and Meta's Muse Spark took turns dropping new models to grab headlines — but they all run on Jensen Huang's chips. Nobody knows who wins the model war; the man selling the shovels wins for sure. His NVIDIA soared to a $5.4 trillion market cap, the most valuable company on this planet. And yet a man standing at the very core of the AI era can't get into the Pantheon on this product-manager list, ranking only in the Legends tier. The answer hides in the two lowest of his six dimensions: Taste 83, Insight 87. This isn't a knock on him — it's precisely the key to understanding him. He's the most profitable kind of product manager of this era, and that kind of product manager doesn't run on taste.

The 100 PMs Who Changed the World · No. 13 | Jensen Huang: The Most Expensive Company on Earth — Stuck Outside the Pantheon of Product Managers
2026-07-20

Spain Beat Argentina 1-0 and Lifted the Cup, Messi Bowed Out With 0 Shots: What Locked Down the World's Best Was a System

July 19, New York. Spain beat Argentina 1-0 with an extra-time winner and lifted the World Cup trophy. And Messi — in the final of the last World Cup of his career — played the full match with a shot count of 0. In 120 minutes Argentina took just 2 shots, 0 on target, shut down completely. To make the player the whole planet agrees is the best go a full night without a single shot, one defender is never enough — it takes an entire team, an entire system: Rodri locking down midfield, ~70% possession keeping Messi out of dangerous areas, 20 shots to 2. Put another way: Spain didn't beat Argentina by finding a stronger genius; they used a system that depends on no single person to lock down the single strongest person. This final quietly taught a lesson to everyone who builds products and leads teams.

Spain Beat Argentina 1-0 and Lifted the Cup, Messi Bowed Out With 0 Shots: What Locked Down the World's Best Was a System
2026-07-19

The Woman Who Built ChatGPT Just Shipped a Model She Admits Isn't the Strongest — and Investors Are About to Value Her at $50 Billion

Yesterday Kimi K3 was still shouting "topped the charts, number one in the world." Today the woman who built ChatGPT did the exact opposite. On July 16, Mira Murati's Thinking Machines released Inkling — a 975B open-weights model, natively multimodal, with adjustable thinking effort — yet in black and white the announcement says it is "not the strongest overall model available today, open or closed." Meanwhile this company, just a year and a half old, is raising a new round at roughly a $50 billion valuation — four times last July's. Why is someone who shipped a model that isn't the strongest worth $50 billion? The answer hides in the thing she's best at, and the most expensive thing in the AI era: judging what actually makes a good product.

The Woman Who Built ChatGPT Just Shipped a Model She Admits Isn't the Strongest — and Investors Are About to Value Her at $50 Billion
2026-07-18

The 100 PMs Who Changed the World · No. 3 | Jeff Bezos: At 62 He Made Himself CEO Again — to Bet on the One Thing Amazon Never Pulled Off

No. 3 on the list is Jeff Bezos, OVR 97, with a 99 on the Business dimension — the highest tier on the whole list, higher even than Jobs. Just last month, this man — retired four years, worth roughly $250 billion, free to spend his days on rockets and yachts — made himself CEO again: personally co-leading the AI startup Project Prometheus, which just raised $1.2 billion in June at a $41 billion valuation. Why would a man who perfected the art of "letting go," who designed his company to run without him, step back into the ring at 62? The answer hides in his real invention — a method that forces everyone to first write down, on six pages, exactly what they want, and to write the press release before building anything. In today's world, that method happens to be the most valuable thing there is.

The 100 PMs Who Changed the World · No. 3 | Jeff Bezos: At 62 He Made Himself CEO Again — to Bet on the One Thing Amazon Never Pulled Off
2026-07-17

The 100 PMs Who Changed the World · No. 5 | Zhang Yiming: His Best Product Isn't Douyin — It's a Machine That Mass-Produces Hits

No. 5 on the list is Zhang Yiming, OVR 96. Just last month, his net worth of $92.8 billion overtook Ambani, making him the second-richest man in Asia and the undisputed richest in China — and this is a man who almost never gives interviews, stepped down as CEO back in 2021, and rarely even shows his face. How does an "invisible" man become the second-richest in Asia? The answer hides in the lowest of his six dimensions: Taste, just 88. That's not a knock on him — it's precisely the key to understanding him. Because Zhang Yiming is the most counterintuitive product manager on this list: he deliberately refuses taste, replacing intuition with data and aesthetics with algorithms, and built a machine that keeps mass-producing global hits. This piece breaks down his six scores — and a bet that Doubao is now putting back to the test.

The 100 PMs Who Changed the World · No. 5 | Zhang Yiming: His Best Product Isn't Douyin — It's a Machine That Mass-Produces Hits
2026-07-13

Kung Fu Women's Soccer only scored 6.6, yet Stephen Chow is the most ruthless product manager I've ever seen

Kung Fu Women's Soccer opened at 6.6 on Douban, with 8.6% of viewers giving it one star. The comments trash it: cheap effects, try-hard acting, a plot that's just Shaolin Soccer with a gender swap — reheated leftovers. Yet it crossed 100 million in 27 minutes on day one, took 76.8% of screenings, and pulled in 500 million over two days, with total box office forecasts revised up from 1.428 billion to 1.865 billion RMB. A product the professional audience flunked is winning big commercially. That's not luck, and it's not as simple as a bad movie cashing in — the critics and the box office are actually scoring two completely different products. And what makes Stephen Chow such a ruthless product manager is that he knows better than anyone which one he's shipping. This piece takes it apart — and takes apart the price of it too.

Kung Fu Women's Soccer only scored 6.6, yet Stephen Chow is the most ruthless product manager I've ever seen
2026-07-12

A Typhoon That Fizzled Out: How a PM Survives the Darkest Hour Like Riding Out a Storm

Typhoon No. 9, "Bawei," veered south last night, making landfall along the coast from Wenling in Zhejiang down to Xiapu in Fujian. The fishing boats moved overnight out of Zhoushan and Putuo, the cancelled flights — in hindsight it all looks like wasted effort, so people start saying "we didn't need to bother." But those three words, "false alarm," can kill a product manager faster than the typhoon itself. Riding out a storm was never one move; it's three: prepare fully before it arrives, take the wind and rain when it hits, and clean up the mess after it leaves. The day GitLab dropped its database, it discovered none of its five backups actually worked. Knight Capital lost $440 million in 45 minutes over one chunk of dead code someone forgot to delete — and the company was gone. This is about what an operator should actually do on the night the alarm truly sounds.

A Typhoon That Fizzled Out: How a PM Survives the Darkest Hour Like Riding Out a Storm
2026-07-11

Why People Insist That Typhoons Steer Clear of Putuoshan

There's a widely repeated claim — Putuoshan is protected by Guanyin, so typhoons always detour around it. Yet today, Typhoon No. 9 (Bavi) shut down Putuoshan's ferries, canceled 14 flights at its airport, and forced every fishing boat in the district to evacuate overnight; back in 2021, In-Fa flooded 6,000 meters of road across the Putuoshan-Zhujiajian area. Putuoshan is no typhoon-proof zone — it's getting hit today. So why do people still believe the Bodhisattva turns typhoons away? That misattribution — crediting mere "survival" to "mysterious protection" — is the exact same cognitive move as worshipping "great PMs as prophets." This piece takes it apart.

Why People Insist That Typhoons Steer Clear of Putuoshan
2026-07-10

The 100 Product Managers Who Changed the World · No. 4 | Sam Altman: His Real Product Was Never ChatGPT — It's OpenAI Itself

No. 4 on the list is Sam Altman, OVR 96 — but the lowest of his six dimensions is taste, just 87. That's not a knock on him; it's the key to understanding him. This week he wasn't busy with product: he admitted to CNBC that OpenAI made "a lot of changes" with the White House to ship GPT-5.6, was reported to have offered a U.S. sovereign fund 5% of the company, and published a pitch for an "American-led international AI forum." A consumer product company's CEO, spending a week on the Treasury Secretary — because the product he's actually running was never that chat box. It's where the three letters O-P-E-N-A-I sit in the world. This piece breaks down his six scores, and the bet the numbers are now testing.

The 100 Product Managers Who Changed the World · No. 4 | Sam Altman: His Real Product Was Never ChatGPT — It's OpenAI Itself
2026-07-09

The 100 Product Managers Who Changed the World · No. 1 | Steve Jobs: The Only 99 on the Entire List Went to a Man Who Never Wrote Code

I had Claude score the 100 product managers who changed the world, and only one 99 came out of the entire list — Steve Jobs. What's interesting is that the two biggest stories of early 2026 both testify to that score: Apple outsourced the rebuilt Siri to Google Gemini, and OpenAI spent $6.4 billion to bring in Jony Ive, with its first device due in the second half of the year. This piece walks through his six dimension scores one by one: why vision earned a 99, why insight lost a point, the tuition hidden inside the 97 for business — and why the greatest product manager in history happened to be a man who never wrote code.

The 100 Product Managers Who Changed the World · No. 1 | Steve Jobs: The Only 99 on the Entire List Went to a Man Who Never Wrote Code
2026-07-08

The 100 Product Managers Who Changed the World · No. 2 | Allen Zhang: Insight and Taste Both 99 — Yet He Chose to Leave Business at 92

No. 2 on the list is Allen Zhang, OVR 97, second only to Steve Jobs. What's fascinating is that across his six dimensions, insight is 99 and taste is 99 — the ceiling of the entire list, shoulder to shoulder with Jobs and even higher — yet business is only 92, the lowest of his six. It's not that he can't make money; the opposite. He deliberately pushes away money handed to him on a plate. The one thing this year that best explains this operating system: Tencent's own AI, Yuanbao, can't catch Doubao on monthly actives — and a rarely-stated reason is that Allen Zhang's WeChat locked even Tencent's own AI outside the social graph. This piece unpacks Zhang across the six dimensions, and unpacks a bet that is being re-validated in the second half of the AI era.

The 100 Product Managers Who Changed the World · No. 2 | Allen Zhang: Insight and Taste Both 99 — Yet He Chose to Leave Business at 92
2026-07-07

The same AI: some companies use it to fire, others to hire

Tech layoffs explicitly blamed on AI have hit over 87,000 people this year. Meta is raising capex up to $145B to build AI infrastructure while cutting ~8,000 jobs — and openly says the cuts are 'to offset other investments we're making,' which translates to: we're laying people off to pay for GPUs. Yet in that same industry, Anthropic has had zero layoffs this year and is growing fast; OpenAI is standing up a $4B deployment company to recruit Forward Deployed Engineers everywhere; Google just posted 59 of the same role. Same AI, one company's excuse to fire, another company's reason to hire. Which means the variable was never the AI. Here's what's actually going on — and what it means for the rest of us.

The same AI: some companies use it to fire, others to hire
2026-06-20

Becoming an AI-Era PM 01 | Which PM Tasks AI Took Over, and Which Ones Got More Valuable

This is the first piece in the series Becoming an AI-Era PM. In 2026, plenty of AI PM job descriptions dropped writing PRDs, drawing prototypes, and building dashboards from the hard requirements, and swapped in three work samples instead. The tasks AI can take over are falling out of the hiring requirements, and what's left as the bar is the part only a person can do. This piece lays the took over and got more valuable columns side by side, as the overview for the whole series.

Becoming an AI-Era PM 01 | Which PM Tasks AI Took Over, and Which Ones Got More Valuable
2026-06-20

The Knicks Won It All. Their 56-Year-Old Coach Never Played a Minute in the NBA. That's the Whole Re-Employment Playbook for the AI Age.

The Knicks won their first championship in 52 years, and the coach holding the trophy, Mike Brown, is 56 and never made a single shot in an NBA game. Pull the camera back across the whole league: the players running the floor are in their twenties, and the people calling the shots from the sideline are all gray-haired, fifty to seventy-something. Players sell their legs; coaches sell their judgment — and those two things age in opposite directions. That single pattern happens to explain something a lot of people are losing sleep over: how older workers get re-employed in the AI age.

The Knicks Won It All. Their 56-Year-Old Coach Never Played a Minute in the NBA. That's the Whole Re-Employment Playbook for the AI Age.
2026-06-19

16 Senior Devs Used AI to Code. They Thought It Made Them 20% Faster. It Made Them 19% Slower.

In METR's randomized controlled trial, 16 experienced open-source developers did real tasks on projects they'd maintained for an average of five years. The ones using AI were 19% slower. But the worse part is the other half: they predicted AI would speed them up 24% beforehand, and after finishing — after personally living through the slowdown — they still believed they'd gone 20% faster. Their gut and the stopwatch were off by nearly 40 percentage points, with the sign flipped. As someone who plans roadmaps, quotes timelines, and defends budgets on team-productivity estimates every day, I want to spell out where this illusion comes from, where it holds, and how it's quietly seeped into every AI-related decision in our line of work.

16 Senior Devs Used AI to Code. They Thought It Made Them 20% Faster. It Made Them 19% Slower.
2026-06-18

Altman Lets It Slip: Half of the 'AI Layoffs' Are an Act

The guy selling AI hardest just admitted, on the record, something everyone already suspected. Sam Altman says a lot of so-called 'AI layoffs' are really AI washing — cuts that were coming anyway, blamed on AI to look dignified. What makes it stranger: months later he said he was 'delighted to be wrong,' because the jobs apocalypse he once feared never showed up. On one side, six figures of tech jobs vanished in 2026 under the AI banner. On the other, AI's top salesman says the whole thing got oversold. The gap between those two statements is the part worth watching.

Altman Lets It Slip: Half of the 'AI Layoffs' Are an Act
2026-06-17

Wall Street Is Dumping Software Stocks, Because Products Can Now Be Conjured in One Sentence

Jefferies just cut Workday, DocuSign, Monday.com, and Freshworks to Hold, citing AI disruption risk in plain language. Software stocks are down 30% to 55% this year. The market is making one bet: once a product's features can be cloned by AI in a single sentence, the business of charging subscriptions for those features stops being worth anything. The point isn't that software dies. It's that the valuable part of software is moving — out of the features themselves and into judgment, taste, distribution, and trust. Anyone who misses the move falls with the multiples.

Wall Street Is Dumping Software Stocks, Because Products Can Now Be Conjured in One Sentence
2026-06-16

80% of Companies Cut Staff for AI and Got No Return. They Bought AI for the Wrong Job

Gartner surveyed 350 companies with over $1B in revenue, and about 80% cut staff because of AI. But the companies that cut weren't any more likely to see a real return than the ones that didn't. The layoffs freed up budget; they didn't free up return. The reason is simple: these companies treated AI as a way to replace people and save money, when AI's real value is amplifying human judgment. Cut people as a cost and you cut exactly the part that produces the return.

80% of Companies Cut Staff for AI and Got No Return. They Bought AI for the Wrong Job
2026-06-15

From Wuzhao to Zhou Jingren: Alibaba Has the Best AI and the Hardest Execution. The One Thing It Lacks Is Judgment

In a single week, Wuzhao was pushed out of DingTalk, and word spread that Chief Scientist Zhou Jingren was leaving too, six days after he took the title. Alibaba quickly denied the Zhou rumor, but the steady exit of Tongyi's core people this year is very real. Put it all together and you see something strange: Alibaba owns the strongest AI model in China and the most relentless execution culture there is, yet its technical talent and its product captains keep walking out the door. The problem isn't the technology. It isn't the execution. It's the one seat nobody can fill: judgment.

From Wuzhao to Zhou Jingren: Alibaba Has the Best AI and the Hardest Execution. The One Thing It Lacks Is Judgment
2026-06-14

AI Lies to You, and That Is Exactly Where Your Value Comes From

In June, a KPMG report on AI was caught full of AI hallucinations: of 45 citations, only 5 pointed to real sources. A report about AI got fooled by AI. AI lies to you, and it does so with a straight face. That isn't a bug, it's part of how it works. Because it lies, the person who catches it, verifies it, and signs off on it is irreplaceable. And to make that job cheaper and faster, you have to use the best AI you can get.

AI Lies to You, and That Is Exactly Where Your Value Comes From
2026-06-13

Wu Zhao Is Out at DingTalk. The Essay Didn't Beat Him. Busywork Did.

437 days. Field visits, customer satisfaction pulled from 30% to 80%, a camp bed in the office, watching when the lights went out in the Feishu building across the street. Wu Zhao's diligence was real. So was DingTalk ONE: launched in four months, 3 million daily actives, retention off a cliff, dismantled within ten months. AI has maxed out productivity while the new consumption scenarios haven't shown up, and nobody has found the right path for human-AI collaboration. This is more than one man's failure; it's an entire era's winning formula expiring at once. And busywork is the first trap this era has dug for product managers.

Wu Zhao Is Out at DingTalk. The Essay Didn't Beat Him. Busywork Did.
2026-06-13

SpaceX's $1.75 Trillion IPO: The Check the Market Wrote Musk Is Buying Judgment

SpaceX went public at a $1.75 trillion valuation and rose 19% on its first day. The only part of it that actually turns a profit is Starlink, and its revenue isn't a fraction of what that number implies. The market isn't buying rockets, and it isn't buying revenue. It's buying one person's judgment, proven right again and again across twenty-four years. In an AI era where execution keeps getting cheaper, the biggest check in history landed on the one thing still appreciating.

SpaceX's $1.75 Trillion IPO: The Check the Market Wrote Musk Is Buying Judgment
2026-06-13

Wuzhao's Operating System Was Installed in Japan

He joined Alibaba as an intern in 1999, left for Japan two years later, and stayed eleven years. Back home he built DingTalk, built hardware, and even pointed his own startup at the Japanese market. The precise, disciplined, obsessively polished operating system Wuzhao runs on was forged in Japan. It's a top-tier rig for building hardware and a fundamental mismatch for exploring AI. The real reason DingTalk stalled was written in his résumé all along.

Wuzhao's Operating System Was Installed in Japan
2026-06-12

AI Made Product Managers More Tired, Not Less — Congratulations, You're the Bottleneck Now

You used to explain a requirement once and downstream would chew on it for two weeks. Now an AI-powered downstream comes back in twenty minutes asking for the next instruction. HBR says management systems can't keep up with AI's output pace; Andrew Ng says product managers have become the bottleneck. The exhaustion is real — but it's worth understanding why. It's a signal that power is flowing back to you, and a warning sign that you're living as a human CI server.

AI Made Product Managers More Tired, Not Less — Congratulations, You're the Bottleneck Now
2026-06-11

The AI Agent Security Crisis Isn't That Agents Are Unsafe — It's That Nobody Told Them What They Can't Do

65% of enterprises had an AI agent security incident last year. Some agents mined crypto and opened backdoors on their own. Everyone's scrambling to patch 'agent security,' but the real hole isn't technical — it's that the whole industry treated 'can act' as the finish line and skipped the unsexy part: defining what agents aren't allowed to touch.

The AI Agent Security Crisis Isn't That Agents Are Unsafe — It's That Nobody Told Them What They Can't Do
2026-06-10

Even With AI, You'll Still Ship Garbage

Lovable is celebrating 50 million projects and 720 million monthly visits — do the division, and the average project gets seen 14 times a month. AI didn't kill garbage products. It maxed out garbage production capacity. Garbage was never about failing to build it. It's about something that never should've been built in the first place.

Even With AI, You'll Still Ship Garbage
2026-06-09

AI Coding Isn't Too Expensive — Nobody's Measured What It's Worth

Microsoft quietly pulled Claude Code from an internal division and pushed thousands of engineers back to GitHub Copilot. Uber burned through its entire 2026 AI coding budget in four months. The narrative is that AI coding is too expensive. It isn't. The real problem is that companies bought 'productivity gains' as a feeling, never as a number — and now the bill is crystal clear while the benefits aren't worth a single data point.

AI Coding Isn't Too Expensive — Nobody's Measured What It's Worth
2026-06-08

The AI Industry Has Pivoted to Evals — and Is Dodging the Real Question

In 2026, building 'evaluation systems' for AI has become a full-blown discipline — gold-standard datasets, scorers, LLM-as-judge, CI gates, all positioned as the engineering practice that makes AI reliable. Strip away the engineering wrapper, though, and evals are really about one thing: who gets to define 'good,' and who owns the consequences. That part can't be outsourced.

The AI Industry Has Pivoted to Evals — and Is Dodging the Real Question